A long day - didn't make as much headway as I wanted. Version 0.02 For Hearing on Monday (ROUGH DRAFT!!)

PRELIMINARY ISSUES

Greetings Consent and Capacity Board and the other parties involved,

 

I have ADHD and I am an ongoing no-touch torture survivor and satanic ritual abuse survivor. I ask that I may be able to read this prepared statement pertaining to my preliminary issues without interruption, please.

 

Preliminary Issue One:

Today I insist that the focus be on the fact that my freedom of religion, specifically Christianity, which is guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, see Section 2(a), which is part of the Constitution (the highest law in all of Canada), which recognizes the supremacy of God, or more specifically my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, is being violated by Ontario’s Mental Health Act and Health Care Consent Act.

Discussion as to other matters, including but not limited to diagnosis, evidence founded in hearsay or arguments limited in scope to the confines of those specific pieces of legislation that themselves are violating my freedom, are therefore both irrelevant and potentially damaging to my reputation. This could open up the possibility of a civil claim of personal injury should opposing counsel not be careful in regard to what subject matter they make the free will choice of speaking about.

My focus will be on one argument. Should opposing counsel bring up certain topics orally (and refer to items contained within the evidence they have submitted) only then may I choose to even respond to them during this hearing.

 

The primary argument is this:

I am a Christian.

The Bible is the word of God.

Romans 13, Romans 14:23, and Luke 17:1-3 are passages contained within the bible.

I consider psychotropics to be sin.

I also consider psychotropics to be pharmakeia, but this is not crucial to the argument.

Therefore, the Mental Health Act and the Health Care Consent Act violate my freedom of religion which is guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

Consent and Capacity Board, please decide that the Mental Health Act and the Health Care Consent Act violate my freedom of religion and then rescind my involuntary patient status, as well as the Form 33 and Form D orders applied for by Dr. Tabitha Rogers.

If the Board does not decide in my favor, I will appeal the decision to the Honourable and Respectable Ontario Superior Court of Justice, while I await the official response from the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorneys General of Canada’s provinces and territories, with the aim of obtaining a Constitutional Remedy.

Should ultimately the Honourable and Respectable Supreme Court of Canada not institute a Constitutional Remedy, to my satisfaction, I will request, in the alternative, that my case be brought before the United Nation’s Human Rights Council to address the rights and freedoms specified in the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights’ (see Article 18) being violated by Canada (a member State):

“Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.”

 

Should it get to this point it is also possible I would seek to have the case brought before the International Criminal Court.

 

I do NOT want to pursue civil or criminal charges against any party involved in my ongoing persecution, including gang-stalking and torture, save for a claim in Small Claims Court (not Divisional Court or the Ontario Superior Court of Justice) which I have already submitted to the Court against Dr. Tabitha Rogers. But, should the parties involved today continue to make both my peacemaking efforts and pursuit of justice more difficult for me, I reserve the right to reconsider the free will choice that I have already made.

 

Preliminary Issue Two:

I was medically battered at the civic, and I was medically battered at the Royal. Even the evidence submitted by opposing counsel supports this.

In the evidence it indicates as early as February 25, 2025, upon my admission to The Royal’s Mood & Crisis Unit I was making the staff aware of the fact that I had an advance directive regarding psychotropics which also indicate that it is against my Christian religious beliefs. Despite this, staff at Mood and Crisis still medically battered me on March 11, 2025. Even if they had done a Form D application prior to this (and they didn't), as initiated by Dr. Tabitha Rogers, it does not change the fact that it was made plain to them that I considered psychotropics to be sin.

In the original Form 33 hearing on January 29, 2025 it is clearly indicated that I considered psychotropics to be sin, and during that admission I provided staff with a copy of my advance directive, repeatedly referred to it and even placed a copy of it on my door (the D6...

 

 

Preliminary Issue Three:

Dr. Tabitha Rogers is prejudiced against me.

Quotes from transcript of audio recording go here.

https://youtube.com/@stevenreynen

Quote her saying in a loud and angry tone, “I DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS”.

Still wants to get the Canadian Governments permission to medically batter me, despite acknowledging again on August 15, 2025 that I am a Christian and I consider psychotropics to be sin.

She tried to get the office of the public guardian and trustee to consent to medically batter me pending the appeal process, and they declined.

She says the staff at Schizophrenia North can medically batter me at their discretion, and they have means, motive, and opportunity to do so.

 

Preliminary Issue Four:

There are gross factual inaccuracies in the evidence submitted by opposing counsel. Misquotes and situations that simply did not happen, and had some of them actually happened, there would have been significant supporting documentation that would be consistent. The evidence submitted by Dr. Tabitha Rogers and her counsel isn’t merely hearsay, but should be treated with utmost suspicion.

 

Preliminary Issue Five:

Dr. Rogers indicates on her latest involuntary status form that I am not a risk of serious harm to others or myself, and the reason she uses to justify keeping me an involuntary patient is risk of substantial mental or physical deterioration. She says that I have already substantially mentally deteriorated. This simply isn’t so, despite the ongoing satanic ritual abuse, and no-touch torture. Just last week I was able to, even before returning to university this fall at Carleton to study philosophy, without researching the solution, devise my own proof from scratch to support my own initial hypothesis. This puzzle may be an entry level one, in terms of objective difficulty, but it has confounded even people with their doctorates. The Schizophrenia Unit Recreation Therapist is in agreement with me, as well as the unit dietitian that my physical health is actually improving, as I gain muscle mass and lose some of the immense amount of weight that I gained when I was previously forced onto the pharmakeia. My three point shot in the gym, now that Dr. Rogers has permitted me to once again attend groups is actually improving, and I continue to spend likely hours a day walking on the unit in order to get exercise, which is good for both my physical and mental well being.

The involuntary status is merely a means of coercion to attempt to get me to voluntarily submit to take something I know is sin. Not to mention the fact that she threatened to treat me with the psychotropic that was once killing me, and is well documented by many parties, as well as force me to ECT treatment should I not voluntarily submit to Invega.

 

Questions for all parties:

 

 

Argument

 

Request:

Decide that Ontario’s Mental Health Act and the Health Care Consent Act violated my freedom of religion and rescind the Form 33 order, and then have both the Form D order and the involuntary patient status rescinded as well.

 

Canada would not force a Jew to eat something that is not kosher

Canada would not force a Muslim to eat something that is haram

Will Canada force a Christian to submit to psychotropics (pharmakeia) which he considers to be sin?

Has Canada forgotten about God?

 

None of my family should ever end up in a place like The Royal (also known as The Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre) being treated how I have been.

There must be some form of remedy to prevent this from happening ever again.

The possibility that in the future a brother or a sister in Christ could be diagnosed as Schizophrenic because they believe something contrary to what a psychiatrist deems socially acceptable (perhaps the biblical account of creation for instance or that they are one of God's elect, please see youtube.com/@stevenreynen for what Dr. Tabitha Rogers had to say about the later) and then be either

A) coerced to "voluntarily" and under duress take 

or

B) forcefully treated with

psychotropics (pharmakeia) scares me.

This is a hill that I am prepared to die on.

 

Should the Consent and Capacity Board not make this decision, I am appealing this to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, and awaiting the response from the Attorney General of Canada as well as the Attorneys General of each respective province and territory of Canada