Secondary argument for Form D appeal + Can they keep me here forever if it is ILLEGAL to TREAT ME - VERY ROUGH DRAFT - Will delete this once I have nap / feel better and make proper post
By refusing to submit to the pharmakeia (and my lawyer Mark Handelman at the time threatened my privilege levels and was encouraging me to submit to something that was sin, and he also said I would likely end up a patient here forever if I did not submit)
and if the Form D application failed, there was also a Form E Application to get my Advance Directive dismissed entirely both of which I could appeal to the Superior Court of Justice) which was rendered redundant when the CCB sided with Dr. Tabitha Rogers and her legal counsel.
Dr. Tabitha Rogers tried to get me treated, pending the appeal process.
I was "treated" many times, before the Form D and E application which makes it hard for you to think while also being tortured, and abused, and the pharmakeia still isn't even out of my system
The reason for the Form D was that I "did not appreciate" or something to that effect (QUOTE DIRECTLY from transcripts and reason for decision) when I wrote the advance directive that if i did not take the pharmakeia I could end up "languishing in the hospital forever and dying here" .
Dr. Alexandra Baines told me today at the CANADIAN State Backed Trap House@TheRoyalMHC
— Steven Reynen (@StevenReynen) September 6, 2025
that she remembers telling me back when I was coming off of my Clozapine (the strongest anti-psychotic):
They can COERCE you to take it.
They cannot FORCE you to take it.
In reference to…
But if they cannot legally treat me, I shouldn't be forced to stay in a hospital, or any other medical facility where the goal is to "treat" or you can be "treated in an emergency" (code white) as that is COERCION which is illegal, and also I am not a criminal so why I am I being detained and isolated from society.
SORT THIS OUT THEN POST
Once CCB rules 33 and the appeal doesn't go through to the SCJ they move to treat you
Treat pending form D appeal - > SDM would not consent til appeal ran its course
Form D appeal fails ->
RESEARCH THIS CLEAN UP LOGIC BELOW - CALM DOWN FIRST - just post with errors in it then research think it through. Just don't want this concept to disappear
If they used that reason to dismiss the Form D, then I could be legally treated if the Form 33 appeal failed too, and then the treatment would never end. I would just kept getting treated against my wishes / consent / consience and religious beliefs.
So that is a horrible reason to throw out an advance directive.
But barring an advance directive, they CAN legally treat you while you fight the Form 33 via an appeal process, but it makes it VERY DIFFICULT if not impossible to do because the pharmakeia impacts your cognition, sedates you, makes you more susceptible to manipulation and more maleable/suggestable, impacts your memory, etc.
If the Form D application didn't work, they would have tried a Form E, just to get it chucked out. don't know how they would have justified that
Even without a Form D or E application if your form 33 appeal goes to the SCJ they can't treat you pending the appeal baring a dirty code white IF the SDM does not sign off on it
Each form A hearing option oppsong counsel to ask permission from PG&T or SDM to do it?
But given advance directive question still ALIVE before court not in spirit of LAW
Add this link to the consitutional question
dirty code white threat every day here - same at any facility that is medical with these legilsation in effect
If I am a criminal -> charge me then put me in a prison where I will not be "treated" like this