Email to All Parties - Can I NOT have an SDM if they will force SIN upon me that will harm and kill me unless it drives me to suicide first?

RE: Application for Termination of SDM (oPGT) - Section 33(8) of the HCCA - SDM Position on my Best Interest

FromSteven Reynen <reynen@pm.me>ToCCB (MOH)<CCB@ontario.ca>CCtabitha.rogers@theroyal.ca, Alexandra.Baines@theroyal.ca, Bradley, Emily<Emily.Bradley@gowlingwlg.com>, Smith, Brooke<brooke.smith@gowlingwlg.com>, Crystal Liu<crystal.liu3@ontario.ca>, Forget, Séline (MAG)<Seline.Forget@ontario.ca>, OPGT@ontario.ca, Meaghan McMahon<meaghan@dmllp.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, Legal Services<Legal.Services@theroyal.ca>, Cara Vaccarino<cara.vaccarino@theroyal.ca>DateMonday, November 10th, 2025 at 10:19Monday, November 10th, 2025 at 10:19Hi Consent and Capcity Board,The SDM is the Office of the Public Guardian and Trustee, and my understanding is that they are a last resort.If they are going to not act in my best interest (see the forwarded emails) as it cannot possibly be in my best interest to force treatment upon me in this scenario, what do I do?I do not want another SDM if they won't act in my best interest (force something that is sin upon me that will either harm and kill me or drive me to suicide before it does).MUST I have one?(I am presently mentally capable, but I must wait til February 27 for six months to elapse between Form A Hearings since my appeal of that Form A Hearing was blocked by the Courts)Regards,Steven Reynena little one of Christ Jesus (one of many)reynen.caJesus loves you!
(and so do I!)Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Monday, November 10th, 2025 at 10:14, CCB (MOH) <CCB@ontario.ca> wrote:

Dear Steven,

 

If the CCB appointed an SDM you may make an application to have that appointment terminated.  If the CCB did not appoint the SDM there are no applications which can be brought before the Board for that purpose.  If there is no court appointed guardian or POA in place you may also be able to bring a Form B to appoint someone to be an SDM. 

 

Sincerely,

Consent and Capacity Board | Commission du consentement et de la capacité  

TEL / TÉL. : 1-866-777-7391 |  (416) 327-4142

FAX / TÉLÉC. : 1-866-777-7273 | (416) 327-4207

www.ccboard.on.ca

 

Les informations contenues dans ce message sont disponibles en français, sur demande.

 

 

 From: Steven Reynen <reynen@pm.me>
Sent: November 9, 2025 3:35 PM
To: CCB (MOH) <CCB@ontario.ca>; tabitha.rogers@theroyal.ca; Alexandra.Baines@theroyal.ca; Bradley, Emily <Emily.Bradley@gowlingwlg.com>; Smith, Brooke <brooke.smith@gowlingwlg.com>; Liu, Crystal (MAG) <Crystal.Liu3@ontario.ca>; Forget, Séline (MAG) <Seline.Forget@ontario.ca>; OPGT (MAG) <OPGT@ontario.ca>; Meaghan McMahon <meaghan@dmllp.ca>; mcu@justice.gc.ca; MAG Correspondence <MAG.Correspondence@ontario.ca>; Legal Services <Legal.Services@theroyal.ca>; Cara Vaccarino <cara.vaccarino@theroyal.ca>
Subject: Application for Termination of SDM (oPGT) - Section 33(8) of the HCCA - SDM Position on my Best Interest

 

Greetings,

 

Per 33(8) of the HCCA, how do I apply to the board for termination of the appointment of the SDM (the OPGT) if the direction to provide consent is upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeals (and ultimately even the Supreme Court of Canada should they grant me leave to appeal) as they would not be operating in my best interest.

 

Perhaps the SDM (the oPGT) could clarify their position on whether or not they feel it would be in my best interest for me to be treated.

 

Please see the facts and arguments in the documents on this page on my website, link below, (which include a work in progress live copy of my factum for my appeal to the Ontario Court of Appeals, and my oral arguments I provided at the hearing at the SCJ on October 17, 2025).

 

Dr. Rogers acknowledges that her treatment will harm and kill me Clozapine (It is well documented that it was killing me with its side effects within the span of a few years). 

 

Dr. Rogers proposes Invega in the alternative via double-bind (which would also harm me and possibly kill me via possibly driving me to suicide). But, Invega would not be effective according to the logic of their profession since they allege Clozapine yielded results and and consequently any other treatment with other psychotropics is unlikely to work (and they already tried Invega during my previous hospitalization and ultimately switched to Clozapine since it wasn't working). This has been affirmed by Dr. Baines on record, and is part of the on-going appeal.

 

Dr. Rogers is of the professional opinion that it would be a race between the treatment killing me and me possibly attempting suicide since the treatment is sin and would be inescapable since it is enforced by a nation state (Canada).

 

https://reynen.ca/link-to-factum-work-in-progress-for-appeal-to-ontario-court-of-appeals-cv-1401-icloud-view-only/

 

Please note, I will be attempting to have the offences in sections 82, 83, and 84 of the HCCA addressed in the upcoming hearing, and drawing attention to Section 22 and Section 26 of the HCCA.

 

Thank you all for your time.

 

Regards,

 

Steven Reynen

a little one of Christ Jesus (one of many)

reynen.ca

Jesus loves you!
(and so do I!)

 

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

1.71 KB1 file attachedpublickey - reynen@pm.me - 0x519D7215.asc1.71 KB

Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem - SCC Cases

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA