It can take up to 150-300 days for the pharmakeia Invega Sustenna (intramuscular injection) to leave your system

Do you think the Superior Court of Justice will allow the trials to take place only once all parties involved can be confidently sure the pharmakeia is entirely out of my system?

According to Drugs.com it can take up to 150-300 days for Invega Sustenna to leave your body.

How Long Does Invega Sustenna Stay in Your System After it Has Been Discontinued?
6 Answers - Posted in: invega, invega sustenna, discontinued - Answer: Invega Sustenna (intramuscular injection) has a long half life range of 25…

I was injected on day one at The Civic once I arrived in psychiatric emergency. And despite my advance directive, doctors Bardell, Rostom, and Haung continued to inject me, even though I made them aware of it, and encouraged them to seek legal counsel.

My last injection was on March 11, 2025.

Dr. Rogers did not continue to inject me after I was transferred to Schizophrenia North, but but her and Dr. Peabody (her resident doctor) did threaten me with ECT treatment and harsher pharmakeia (Clozapine, that was literally killing me previously) if I did not voluntarily consent to the Invega Sustenna.

I believe, but could be mistaken that, Dr. Rogers and Dr. Peabody also tried to get my substitute decision maker (the public guardian and trustee) to agree to inject me before applying for a Form D.

She then filed for a Form D and Form E application to the CCB.

Once the Consent and Capacity Board ruled in Dr. Rogers favour for the Form D (and declared the Form E redundant), she tried to get my substitute decision maker to consent to inject me, pending the appeal, but they declined to do so until the appeal process had fully run its course.

Dr. Rogers has repeatedly acknowledged that she knows I will kill myself if she is successful in forcing me back onto the pharmakeia once more.

And yet she is still persistent in her pursuit to drug me with pharmakeia.

Hopefully I can, with the help of my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit, convince a judge of the honourable and respectable Superior Court of Justice that it is unethical to walk a Christian man to suicide via attempting to force them to take a substance they consider utmost sin, despite a clear advance directive.

BUT!

according to this website (Drugs.com), my mind and body might not get back to 'normal' until the 5th of January, 2026.

So here is the question.

In the pursuit of fair trials for the Forms 4, 33, and D appeals with the Superior Court of Justice given what we know about pharmakeia, would it be in my best interest, that of the courts, and even Dr. Rogers that the trials with the Superior Court of Justice do not commence until all parties are confident the pharmakeia is out of my system, since I am representing myself?

I want a fair trial.

I do not want to be forced onto pharmakeia.

I do not want to commit suicide.

I want to be discharged from The Royal as soon as possible.

I want to have my religious beliefs, my personal convictions, and my advance directive respected.

I want an environment to prepare my factums for these appeals where I feel safe, and can better concentrate on my work, not under constant threat of a dirty code white, and I am not being abused by the doctor whose care I am in, since the outcome of these trials determine whether I end up in a position with no resort but to commit suicide.

Matthew 5:6

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
    for they will be filled.

I am choosing once more to trust my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit with everything.

Praise. The. LORD!


Update (July 4th, Before Bed):

Would the apartment on Schizophrenia North be a good spot? Where I won't be abused by staff or my fellow patents, since I am still on a Form 4 and thereby involuntary until further notice?

A different in patient psychiatrist?

I emailed this newsletter to the Ottawa Superior Court of Justice email address, the Consent and Capacity Board, my previous lawyer Mark Handelman, Dr. Rogers, Legal Services at The Royal, the Schizophrenia North Unit Manager, and the Client & Family Relations Team Manager.

Remember, on a surface level, this facility is still one of Canada's leading mental health centres.

I could be there for years until this matter is settled.

It could go all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Oh, and I also want to do a Civil Claim for Medical Malpractice against Dr. Rogers. It isn't about the money, I just want the Canadian legal system to ultimately side with me and award me what would then buy me a can of Coke. I wonder if she would have it with me at that point?

Let's see what happens.


Update: July 5th, 2025 @ 04:38

Now, I am not a lawyer, I don't even have my undergraduate yet.

But, if the courts did not hear my concern and help me meet those conditions so that I may have a fair trial (which I feel is reasonable since):

The suite (the trial apartment - ha ha!, before discharge) on Schizophrenia North, is already built and I do not believe anyone is occupying it,

Dr. David Attwood told me already that he would be willing to be my psychiatrist, given the appropriate, yet infinitesimally likely (and I quote "It would take a miracle"), circumstances, and I believe he is technically Dr. Rogers' boss, since he is a Medical Director (according to the talk I had with Jonathan Vant, the Client & Family Team Relations Manager, yesterday in private on Schizophrenia North), and has never been my psychiatrist, even though we did do one speaking engagement together back when I was still an MK ULTRA slave and on the pharmakeia. And, he is therefore familiar with my circumstances, the going-ons of the Schizophrenia North, South, and Out-patient units, and also has a boss at The Royal, Dr. Benoit Mulsant the interim Chief of Staff (Since May 26th, 2025) at The Royal, to whom he is accountable.

The time I would need (til January 5th, 2026 or another agreeable date thereafter) would give all parties more time to familiarize themselves with the situation and adequately prepare and it isn't a preposterous amount of time to begin with.

Then would that not be, in and of itself, grounds for a mistrial for each appeal process to the Supreme Court of Canada? (It is my understanding that not all trials that make it to the Court of Appeals make it to the Supreme Court of Canada).

Not to mention, anything I said or did before then, one could argue, would be inadmissible in court, at least since the day they injected me against my will (January 20th, 2025) since according to the actual theologians from GotQuestions.org on their article about pharmakeia:

Substances that alter a person’s perceptions can be used as legitimate medicines (1 Timothy 4:4). They can also be abused for recreation. Even worse, they can be used in a predatory manner, influencing others and taking advantage of their skewed awareness. The biblical concept of “sorcery” seems to lean toward the latter end of this spectrum. A biblical “sorcerer” could be thought of as the equivalent of a modern “drug dealer.” Or as the type of person who slips chemicals into a woman’s drink to take advantage of her.

Now, would that make Dr. Rogers, who threw up a 666 hand sign at me in private before she restricted me to the Schizophrenia North unit, for no good reason, and referred to her current body as her glorified body, a sorcerer? She does laugh kind of funny, but then again I am not into that 'Hogwarts' stuff.

Remember, I am a Christian. The staff at The Royal (many of whom also threw up the 666 hand sign, and now that I think of it I never saw Dr. Attwood do such a thing) didn't even like me singing hymns here on Schizophrenia North, but they never condemned someone shouting many times over a few week period their support for Satan, among many other concerning events.

Which brings me back to this:

I want a fair trial.

I do not want to be forced onto pharmakeia.

I do not want to commit suicide.

I want to be discharged from The Royal as soon as possible.

I want to have my religious beliefs, my personal convictions, and my advance directive respected.

I want an environment to prepare my factums for these appeals where I feel safe, and can better concentrate on my work, not under constant threat of a dirty code white, and I am not being abused by the doctor whose care I am in, since the outcome of these trials determine whether I end up in a position with no resort but to commit suicide.

Matthew 5:6

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness,
    for they will be filled.

I am choosing once more to trust my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit with everything.

Praise. The. LORD!

Update:

I have a constitutional right to represent myself and a constitutional right to a fair trial. If for some ungodly reason, and I don't want to speculate as to why, the honourable and respectable Superior Court of Justice doesn't agree with my initial argument above, they might as well immediately and explicitly lock me up and throw away the key.

The Canadian Government ultimately answers to my Abba.

I refuse to believe that Canada has forgotten about God.


Update: July 5th, 2026 @ 08:45

I told Mark Handelman who said:

"Steven,
Whether or not you have drugs in your system is irrelevant to the timing of the appeal. Sorry.

Steven Reynen

"As far as I am concerned you are no longer my lawyer, unless the Superior Court of Justice forces you upon me.
I want a lawyer that I can trust."

Subscribe to a little one of Christ Jesus

Don’t miss out on the latest issues. Sign up now to get access to the library of members-only issues.
jamie@example.com
Subscribe