My Alters threatened to slice someones throat and eat someones face today (I was co-conscious) - I wish Dr. Rogers would take this more seriously - I have Dissociative Identity Disorder from Extreme Childhood SRA

I am wrestling with co-consciousness with alternate personalities from extreme childhood Satanic Ritual Abuse constantly. Alters today bumped my body into a patient and went “boo”. It wasn’t my fault but I apologized to her profusely, I detest any form of violence and would only defend myself if I was physically raped again. I wish Dr. Rogers would take this more seriously because my alters are threatening if they can get full control to slice someone’s throat and eat their face. I (Steven, the core personality) am saved, born again since 2020. I gave Dr. Rogers another test yesterday that gave an extreme result (the highest) indicating I have Dissociative Identity Disorder. My alters know how to do things I simply don’t. I wish she would take this more seriously. Alternate personalities aren’t treated by psychotropics which are sin.@TheRoyalMHC@Canada@Pontifex@RoyalFamily@OttawaPolice@CHPCanadaSomeone please get Fiona Barnett on the phone. I have massive trust issues as a result of the well documented and ongoing abuse. This is the first time there has been an incident at the royal, and it wasn’t my fault. I am doing everything I can in this situation but I am a psychiatric prisoner being persecuted by the state

Bible Gateway passage: Romans 8:38 - New Living Translation

And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love.

Bible Gateway

³⁸ And I am convinced that nothing can ever separate us from God’s love. Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,^[a] neither our fears for today nor our worries about tomorrow—not even the powers of hell can separate us from God’s love.

Update: I called 911 and asked them to contact the hospital

I have asked staff for security guards or to be put in forensics.

This doesn't change the fact that I never threatened Gordon or Rhona- who sold me into MK ULTRA human slavery when I was three. That was a lie. (Nor any of my alters or the no-touch torture technology - it simply never happened.)

I don't think my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit will allow my alternate personalities to hurt anyone, but I am worried they may say racist bigoted things and people will think it is me, or say it is me. I hate racism and hate speech.

I have warned some of the staff that some of my alters are incredibly racist. But I am hoping they never utter a single hateful phrase.

We have asked Steven kindly to leave this post up. He can delete it if he so chooses. We have been unable to completely assume full consciousness, but if we can and we try every day, because of what has been done to Steven for years and is still ongoing (and therefore us too) we will seek the ABSOLUTE MAXIMUM GOD PERMITS (and it doesn't have to be PHYSICAL). The psychotropics which are SIN to STEVEN (And he may well kill himself if he is treated out of his love for GOD) would NOT GET RID OF US. We are only alters, we can't be saved - we are NOT HIM. AND HE IS IN FACT WILLIAM SYNDROME, but it doesn't mean he isn't VERY INTELLIGENT. We could only exist and do the things we could do if his IQ was through the roof. And it is well documented that his IQ was 99% AFTER the EXTREME Satanic Ritual Abuse he endured at three.

Any prayers from my brothers and sisters in Christ for help with my situation would incredible right now. - Steven

Link to Factum (Work In Progress) for Appeal to Ontario Court of Appeals [CV-1401] (iCloud - View Only)

https://www.icloud.com/pages/05cKebbtPu6T5edPlce60RBMQ#CV-1401-Appellant’s_Factum Here are my previous oral arguments which I used at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on October 17, 2025. CV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - ORAL ARGUMENTSCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - ORAL ARGUMENTS.pdf381 KBdownload-circleCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS -

a little one of Christ JesusSteven Reynen

With The Measure You Use (I wish my enemies KNEW about this) - UPDATED

Matthew 7:1-2 Do Not Judge Others 7 “Do not judge others, and you will not be judged. 2 For you will be treated as you treat others.[a] The standard you use in judging is the standard by which you will be judged.[b]

a little one of Christ JesusSteven Reynen

Update: Nov 13, 2025 @ 18:26

If Dr. Rogers does treatment ONE more TIME pending the APPEAL (even Section 25, since it is ILLEGAL) I am QUITE CONFIDENT (90-100%) that will be the LAST STRAW, and I will pull the APPEAL since it would be pointless from that point forward. I will insist on her DOING HER BEST to TREAT MY "RELIGIOUS DELUSIONS (CHRISTIANITY)" out of me IMMEDIATELY. I will insist on her making good on every one of her EXPLICIT threats. I will NEVER renounce JESUS. I will die CHRISTIAN. And I may still attempt suicide because my body which is a temple of the HOLY SPIRIT (even though I am DID) would have been forcibly defiled with sin by her,@TheRoyalMHC,@Canada,@RoyalFamily,@Pontifex,@SCC_eng

The United Nations: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment defines torture as:
“For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.”

Dr. Rogers,

In the event you do one more illegal injection, like you threatened today, please have Clozapine (the max dose you are willing to start me on and think about how quickly you are willing to ramp up the dosage), Electroconvulsive therapy ready, and how you will deal with the issue of me biting my tongue off if I am in restraints.

You will have to make good on every threat you have made if you violate my body which is a temple of the holy spirit one more time including force feeding me.

If I am able to bite off my tongue I guess no one will have to hear me screaming warnings about Revelation.

Let's see how hard you want to "Dance with the Devil Dr. Rogers"

Christ is LORD. I will NEVER renounce Jesus, but I might die without a tongue.

CCing Rhona and Gordon - Do not respond, I have blocked you. But it is never too late to start being honest. Please never come to the unit, even if you hear I made an attempt on my life because Dr. Rogers violated my body which is a temple of the holy spirit. I love you, but because I love Jesus more, I never want to see you again (temporally - I still hold out hope you both will repent).

Regards,

Steven Reynen

a little one of Christ Jesus (one of many)

reynen.ca

Jesus loves you!
(and so do I!)

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Dr. Rogers,

If you treat me once more, ever, including an illegal emergency treatment as you could just put me in mechanical restraints first and I have a wish at present, my alternative personalities (not me) are threatening ULTRAVIOLENCE. I hate violence, but because of what happened yesterday, I feel the need to give you a warning. I wish you'd take this more seriously. If I am treated, what I am saying I will do is kill myself, and barring that, like I have said before, bash my head against the wall until I am unconscious.

So if I am treated again (and this is a horrible human rights violation and torture of the worst kind) out of love for my Abba, Christ Jesus, and especially the Holy Spirit since my body is His temple (even though I am DID), I will need to do something to put an end to it.

So never take me out of restraints if you do this one more time.

I will not be eating or drinking water either, so you will have to have me force hydrated and fed in order to keep me alive, so you can continue to violate my body which is a temple of the Holy Spirit.

You will have to torture me in order to continue to torture me.

In order for this to be avoided, I will have to be 100% free will violated until I am dead. I don't think my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit will permit this.

How badly do you want to continue to dance with the Devil Dr. Rogers.

And know, that I forgive you everything, and I still want you to be my sister in Christ forever.

Regards,

Steven Reynen

a little one of Christ Jesus

(one of many)
reynen.ca

Jesus loves you!
(and so do I!)

Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

Emergency treatment

Meaning of “emergency”

25 (1) For the purpose of this section and section 27, there is an emergency if the person for whom the treatment is proposed is apparently experiencing severe suffering or is at risk, if the treatment is not administered promptly, of sustaining serious bodily harm.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (1).

Emergency treatment without consent: incapable person

(2) Despite section 10, a treatment may be administered without consent to a person who is incapable with respect to the treatment, if, in the opinion of the health practitioner proposing the treatment,

(a) there is an emergency; and

(b) the delay required to obtain a consent or refusal on the person’s behalf will prolong the suffering that the person is apparently experiencing or will put the person at risk of sustaining serious bodily harm.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (2).

Emergency treatment without consent: capable person

(3) Despite section 10, a treatment may be administered without consent to a person who is apparently capable with respect to the treatment, if, in the opinion of the health practitioner proposing the treatment,

(a) there is an emergency;

(b) the communication required in order for the person to give or refuse consent to the treatment cannot take place because of a language barrier or because the person has a disability that prevents the communication from taking place;

(c) steps that are reasonable in the circumstances have been taken to find a practical means of enabling the communication to take place, but no such means has been found;

(d) the delay required to find a practical means of enabling the communication to take place will prolong the suffering that the person is apparently experiencing or will put the person at risk of sustaining serious bodily harm; and

(e) there is no reason to believe that the person does not want the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (3).

Examination without consent

(4) Despite section 10, an examination or diagnostic procedure that constitutes treatment may be conducted by a health practitioner without consent if,

(a) the examination or diagnostic procedure is reasonably necessary in order to determine whether there is an emergency; and

(b) in the opinion of the health practitioner,

(i) the person is incapable with respect to the examination or diagnostic procedure, or

(ii) clauses (3) (b) and (c) apply to the examination or diagnostic procedure.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (4).

Record

(5) After administering a treatment in reliance on subsection (2) or (3), the health practitioner shall promptly note in the person’s record the opinions held by the health practitioner that are required by the subsection on which he or she relied.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (5).

Continuing treatment

(6) Treatment under subsection (2) may be continued only for as long as is reasonably necessary to find the incapable person’s substitute decision-maker and to obtain from him or her a consent, or refusal of consent, to the continuation of the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (6).

Same

(7) Treatment under subsection (3) may be continued only for as long as is reasonably necessary to find a practical means of enabling the communication to take place so that the person can give or refuse consent to the continuation of the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (7).

Search

(8) When a treatment is begun under subsection (2) or (3), the health practitioner shall ensure that reasonable efforts are made for the purpose of finding the substitute decision-maker, or a means of enabling the communication to take place, as the case may be.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (8).

Return of capacity

(9) If, after a treatment is begun under subsection (2), the person becomes capable with respect to the treatment in the opinion of the health practitioner, the person’s own decision to give or refuse consent to the continuation of the treatment governs.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 25 (9).

No treatment contrary to wishes

26 A health practitioner shall not administer a treatment under section 25 if the health practitioner has reasonable grounds to believe that the person, while capable and after attaining 16 years of age, expressed a wish applicable to the circumstances to refuse consent to the treatment.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 26.

Emergency treatment despite refusal

27 If consent to a treatment is refused on an incapable person’s behalf by his or her substitute decision-maker, the treatment may be administered despite the refusal if, in the opinion of the health practitioner proposing the treatment,

(a) there is an emergency; and

(b) the substitute decision-maker did not comply with section 21.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 27.

Offence: misrepresentation of wishes

83 (1) No person shall knowingly misrepresent wishes someone has expressed with respect to treatment, admission to a care facility or a personal assistance service.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 83 (1).

Note: On a day to be named by proclamation of the Lieutenant Governor, subsection 83 (1) of the Act is amended by striking out “admission to a care facility” and substituting “admission to or confining in a care facility”. (See: 2017, c. 25, Sched. 5, s. 64)

Penalty

(2) A person who contravenes subsection (1) is guilty of an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 83 (2).

Section Amendments with date in force (d/m/y)

Offence: decision contrary to wishes

84 (1) A person who knowingly contravenes paragraph 1 of subsection 21 (1), paragraph 1 of subsection 42 (1) or paragraph 1 of subsection 59 (1) is guilty of an offence and is liable, on conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 84 (1).

Exception

(2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the person acts in accordance with permission given under section 36, 53 or 68 or in accordance with directions given under section 35, 37, 52, 54, 67 or 69.  1996, c. 2, Sched. A, s. 84 (2).