NEWS: Dr. Rogers implemented a new 'Care Plan' that could be abused - all the while I am being persecuted for my religious beliefs
This is dangerous. Are some of my brothers and sisters in Christ being treated the same way?
Dr. Rogers has instituted a new care plan, so that if staff feel I am being (and I quote) "challenging, disruptive, intrusive, labile, inappropriate, or incongruent" that my "privileges" of possessing a tablet, other electronics, access to the courtyard, paper and pens, and the ability to order food can all be removed from me for increasing periods of time (starting with 24 hours, then 48 on the second occurance, and so forth).
I would then have to (and I quote) "earn back" these "privileges".
This does not seem ethical at all!
This is at the discretion of staff, some of whom, as I have documented, have gaslit me or abused me, or told me things like "Well just don't make eye contact with anyone".
(Some of which is documented on this very website, which is backed up publically on archive.org.)
Perhaps the staff feel threatened by me because they are participants in Dr. Rogers walking me to suicide, emotionally abusing me, psychologically abusing me and spiritually abusing me by discriminating against my religious beliefs, and wanting to violate my advance directive. Are these not protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms here in Canada?
Would they (the staff) not then have motive (possibly), to remove the devices that I use to document my discrimination (see pen and paper, even), which I need for both my legal proceedings and to combat the psychological abuse of gaslighting, all the while I was previously medically battered during my involuntary stay (which began at The Civic) and am not able to best think for myself due to the pharmakeia. Not to mention the ongoing no touch torture and satanic ritual abuse.
Good thing my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are keeping me safe, and not allowing me to carry a cross that I cannot bear.
I hope the College of Physicians and Surgeons Ontario takes my ongoing complaint seriously and choose to investigate as does the Ontario Ombudsman whom I am currently complaining to that the CCB discriminated against my religious beliefs, especially since within the Reasons for Decision for my Form 33 lies the following quote (the Patient Ombudsman referred me to them).
'The evidence also revealed that SR referred to all medications as being a "sin" and he was refusing all pills as antipsychotic medications..'
Dr. Rogers still wants to restrict me to the unit, and has since implemented these questionable (at best) policies, until I am before the Superior Court of Justice, and yet when asked, she acknowledged that she has never seen a patient make it that far.
She historically also said I was delusional for believing I was one of God's elect (a little one of Christ Jesus) and I believe this is in one of my audio recordings of our sessions which I took so she could not gaslight me (see my resources page). She has since refused consent for me to record our sessions.
What do I do if I cannot even record my abuses?
She is telling me everything I report to her is either a delusion or a byproduct of Schizophrenia. She won't even hear what I have to say about being brutally raped at the age of three and being made to murder at least one person (a child) whose name was James. She says anything else I tell her about that she will dismiss outright as crazy.
Recording your discrimination is advice right from the Human Rights Legal Services Centre, who closed my application to them without contacting me.
I am once again choosing to trust my Abba, Christ Jesus, and the Holy Spirit with everything!
Hallelujah!
Update (July 8th, 2025 @ 16:27): Emailing this to Jonathan Vant, the Client & Family Relations Team Manager so that it can be examined by the interim Chief of Staff Benoit Mulsant and the Schizophrenia Program Director Dr. Attwood. I want this reviewed by The Royal, and see whether it adheres to the hospital policies and Canadian Laws.
Note: Jonathan Vant told me on Friday July 4th that he was leaving for vacation soon, but that he would be there for the meeting on Monday, and that Benoit Mulsant was also on vacation (when I formally requested he review Dr. Rogers decision about restricting me to the unit until I am standing before the Superior Court of Justice, and whether this was acceptable and ethical according to The Royal. Among other formal requests), Jonathan Vant was not there on Monday.
Since Jonathan Vant and the Chief of Staff are on vacation, who do I bring this new dangerous 'care plan' of Dr. Rogers to?
I guess I will have to just be patient and by God's grace endure it, until Jonathan Vant comes back.