a little one of Christ Jesus (Page 13)

Sign in Subscribe

More issues

Beginning Process of Applying for Asylum in The Netherlands (Mongolia said NO)

Apply for asylum in the Netherlands | INDYou want to apply for asylum in the Netherlands. Find out what the requirements are and information about the asylum procedure and other applications.IND You can obtain a residence permit if you meet one of the following requirements: * You have well-founded reasons to

Mongolia said they are not taking refugees

I called Mongolia’s embassy here in Ottawa and was told that they do not accept refugees. A dream just died. @Refugees @UN @UNHumanRights @MongoliaCanada @IntlCrimCourt — Steven Reynen (@StevenReynen) September 29, 2025

Contacted the International Criminal Court

a3afc371-6c42-4188-bf9c-a28f90d73d68a3afc371-6c42-4188-bf9c-a28f90d73d68.pdf519 KBdownload-circle I just officially contacted the International Criminal Court. Let's see what Dr. Tabitha Rogers, The Royal, Canada, and Babylon do next. Trusting my Abba, Christ Jesus and The Holy Spirit with everything. Christ Jesus is the Lord of Lords and King of Kings. My allegiance

Constitutional Question Served to all parties (Public Hearing October 17, 2025 @ 10:00 at the Ottawa Courthouse)

Section 21(1)2 and Section 35 of the Health Care Consent Act should be struck down as they are constitutionally invalid (unconstitutional) and therefore of no force or effect.

Updated Factum Served to All Parties via E-mail.

FACTUMSERVED-SEPT28.2025FACTUMSERVED-SEPT28.2025.pdf410 KBdownload-circleFACTUM CV-25-99970 APPELLANT - STEVEN REYNENFACTUM CV-25-99970 APPELLANT - STEVEN REYNEN.pdf108 KBdownload-circleNoticeOfConsitituionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERSNoticeOfConsitituionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERS.pdf151 KBdownload-circle Please see attached updated factum. This is it being served to all parties.Please confirm receipt as soon as possible. I will then file it. The final version of the Notice

Latest Version: Form 4F - Notice of Constitutional Question - To Be Filed/Served on Monday (when FINALIZED)

NoticeOfConsitituionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERSNoticeOfConsitituionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERS.pdf151 KBdownload-circle See the above PDF for proper formatting. Court file no.: CV-25-00099970-0000 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: STEVEN REYNEN Applicant (Appellant) * and – DR. TABITHA ROGERS Respondent (Respondent in Appeal) NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION The appellant intends to question the constitutional validity

Dr. Tabitha Roger's Form D Application (and the appeal) in a NUTSHELL

"2. If the person does not know of a wish applicable to the circumstances that the incapable person expressed while capable and after attaining 16 years of age, or if it is impossible to comply with the wish, the person shall act in the incapable person’s best interests.

Updated Rough Draft (have the weekend to finish it comfortably) of my Notice of Constitutional Question for the upcoming public Hearing on October 17, 2025 at 10:00

The appellant has no confidence if the Judge rules against him that his appeal to the Court of Appeals will go through, and intends to immediately start hunger and water striking if said decision has been rendered until it is proved to him that his appeal will be heard by the Court of Appeals.

Need donations so I can have my Form 4F process served once finished. Please e-transfer reynen@pm.me

Could use money at reynen@pm.me via interact e transfer so I can get process servers to serve my notice constitutional question to the AG of Canada and Ontario once it is finished please — Steven Reynen (@StevenReynen) September 26, 2025 If you are Canadian. Please write an advance directive

ROUGH INCOMPLETE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION (TO BE FILED/SERVED BEFORE OCTOBER 3, 2025)- UNDER STRAIN AND RECENTLY ILLEGALLY DRUGGED (AGAIN 2x)

ROUGH-Form4F-ConstitutionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERS-OCT17.2025ROUGH-Form4F-ConstitutionalQuestion-CV-25-99970-REYNENvROGERS-OCT17.2025.pdf113 KBdownload-circle Court file no.: CV-25-99970 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: STEVEN REYNEN Applicant (Appellant) * and – DR. TABITHA ROGERS Respondent (Respondent in Appeal) NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION The appellant intends to question the constitutional validity and to claim a remedy