Sign in Subscribe

Topic

Psychiatric Prison

A collection of 388 issues

Dr. Rogers Says THIS is in my BEST INTEREST (OCT 31, 2025) - HOW? Daniel 1:8!

She said she will have me restricted to my room once treatment begins (perhaps that way the treatment kills me before i die by suicide). I asked her how she will stop me from biting off my own tongue to avoid my body (which is a temple of the Holy

The CCB Dismisses my Leave ('Foreshadowing' Canada BLOCKING my ongoing Form D/E Appeal at any point?) of a Form A Application (Official Response Included)

SR dismissal of leaveSR dismissal of leave.pdf151 KBdownload-circle I acknowledge they are not obligated to do so, at least legally in accordance with present law despite clear failures morally, but I feel that is indeed a material change in circumstances (one simply has to check the previous transcripts/oral

Reasonably Foreseeable Consequences: Which is it Dr. Rogers? (Life or Immediate Discharge without allowing me to replace my drivers license and passport?)

Dr. Rogers was saying the other day the reasonable foreseeable consequences of continuing to refuse treatment are INDEFINITE HOSPITALIZATION. Today she says if the Courts rule I can’t be ‘treated’ that @TheRoyalMHC isn’t a hotel and she’ll ask me to leave. WHICH IS IT? Ready to… — Steven

Two BIG Secrets REVEALED. Never Public before. One I never told ANYONE. (Luke 8:17 - An E-mail)

Email-Luke817-TwoBigSecrets-NeverToldOnetoAnyoneEmail-Luke817-TwoBigSecrets-NeverToldOnetoAnyone.pdf3 MBdownload-circleFormA-Application-StevenReynen-Oct27-2025FormA-Application-StevenReynen-Oct27-2025.pdf82 KBdownload-circleCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - ORAL ARGUMENTSCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - ORAL ARGUMENTS.pdf381 KBdownload-circleCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - CLOSING ORAL ARGUMENTSCV-25-99970 - REYNEN v ROGERS - CLOSING ORAL ARGUMENTS.pdf117 KBdownload-circle Hi all, Luke 8:17 New

Canadian Case Law for Section 35 of the Health Care Consent Act (Surprise!) - Dr. Rogers Form D/E Application (appealing to the Ontario Court of Appeals)

Case law concerning section 35 of the Health Care Consent Act is rare because the section is often rendered moot by events like a patient's death. A key case is *Re JEP* (2018), 2018 ONCA 155, where the court confirmed that a person who has died can no

Dr. ROGERS: Either Clozapine OR Invega Long Acting Injectable (both SIN. One will KILL ME QUICKLY, the other according to them won’t even “work”)

Dr. ROGERS presented me with two options today if Canada continues to endorse my TORTURE. Clozapine (which was LITERALLY killing me physically in addition to everything else in my Advance Directive) Invega Long Acting Injectable, which is unlikely to even work Dr. BAINES: "if… — Steven Reynen (@StevenReynen) October 24,

Dr. Rogers, The Royal, and Canada have behaved, and are behaving worse than the infamous King Nebuchadnezzar in the book of Daniel. WARNING

Dr. Rogers, @TheRoyalMHC and @SCJOntario_en have behaved and are behaving worse than King Nebuchadnezzar in the book of Daniel. Look what an example my Abba, Christ Jesus and the Holy, Holy, Holy, Holy Spirt made of him as a WARNING — Steven Reynen (@StevenReynen) October 24, 2025

I want to discus my mental capacity with the two part test in mind with Dr. Rogers. I am mentally capable according to the test.

I want to have a conversation with Dr. Rogers about whether or not I am currently mentally capable per The two-part test: To be found capable, a person must meet both parts of this test: Understanding: They must be able to understand the information relevant to the decision.… — Steven Reynen

Failure on behalf of The Royal, The Ottawa Hospital to notify the Substitute Decision Maker (PG&T) per Section 43 of the HCCA

Email to Parties involved in my TORTURE Did TOH and ROMHC not fail to provide the SDM (the office of the OPGT) with notice of my advance directive (see evidence package submitted by Dr. Rogers for clear evidence they were made aware of my wish/advance directive on the day

YouTube Video on Impending Bills C-2, C-8, C-9 - (A Quote From John Carpay of Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms) - Matthew 24

John Carpay of Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms "...Bodily Autonomy. Which includes the right not to get injected with a substance that you don't want to get injected with..." (Referring the the COVID Vaccines. But isn't this also applicable to Psychotropics AKA pharmakeia, which